REPAIR OR REPLACE? How Condo Boards Can Make the Right Structural Decision
- Dan Fried
- Apr 30
- 2 min read
It often starts with a report on something that doesn’t seem urgent.
A crack along a balcony edge. Minor surface wear in a parking garage slab. A small area of deterioration on the building envelope. To most people, these are routine signs of aging—something that can be repaired and
moved on from.
And sometimes, that’s exactly what they are.
But not always.
A small crack may seem minor, and a localized repair may appear to solve the problem. In some cases, it does. But beneath the surface, there may already be water entering the structure, corrosion forming around reinforcing
steel, or waterproofing systems that are no longer effective.
This is where experience matters.
Concrete deterioration is rarely just a surface issue. In Ottawa’s climate, repeated freeze–thaw cycles allow moisture to penetrate deeper into the structure over time. What begins as a visible crack can expand internally, weakening the material and eventually affecting the reinforcing steel that gives the structure its strength.
By the time damage becomes obvious, the underlying issue has often been developing for years.
When a specialist evaluates a building, the focus is not simply on what is visible, but on what that visible damage
represents. Is the structure still performing as intended, or is it beginning to fail in a more fundamental way?
What an RFS Does and What It Doesn’t Do
What a Reserve Fund Study Does
Provides a long-term funding plan Forecasts repair and replacement timing
Estimates costs to support stable
condo fees
Covers major systems like roofs, garages, and building envelope
What a Reserve Fund Study Doesn’t Do
It is not a real-time condition assessment
It does not capture unexpected deterioration
It may miss hidden or developing issues. It cannot replace ongoing inspections
"An RFS tells you what should happen over time — not what is happening right now”
These are the questions that determine whether a repair is appropriate—or whether replacement should be considered.
“What looks like a repair today can become a replacement tomorrow—if the underlying condition isn’t fully understood
In many cases, targeted repairs are the right approach—particularly when damage is isolated and the underlying cause has been identified and addressed. Early intervention can stabilize a condition and extend the service life of a component.
But not all deterioration remains isolated.
When similar issues begin to appear across multiple areas, or when previously repaired sections continue to fail, it often indicates a larger underlying condition.
At that point, what appears to be a repair may actually be the early stage of a broader system failure.
This is where the decision begins to shift from repairing visible damage to evaluating whether the component, as a whole, is reaching the end of its service life.
FINAL THOUGHT
Most major replacement projects are anticipated through the reserve fund study, but when unexpected conditions arise, boards and managers are required to make decisions outside of that plan.
In the end, the goal is not simply to repair what is visible but to make informed decisions that protect the structure, the budget, and the long-term performance of the building.
By Dan Fried, RCM, CSM
Building Restoration Specialist Mirkwood Dynamics Restoration
Comments